Pushback and Buy-In in Law Enforcement Leadership

 

In law enforcement leadership, the dynamics of pushback and buy-in play a crucial role in successfully implementing organizational changes and initiatives. Understanding the challenges faced by police leaders in garnering support from their teams is paramount to effectively addressing resistance and navigating through it. The closed police sub-culture and the pressure from the police bureaucracy can significantly influence a leader’s decision-making regarding organizational changes. This underscores the need for police leaders to recognize the complexities of their organizations and the methods available to garner support or neutralize resistance to change. Additionally, it is important to emphasize the importance of identifying effective leadership behaviors tailored to the unique culture of law enforcement, with a focus on traits such as Transformational Leadership and Participatory Leadership. These insights highlight the significance of leadership approaches that can foster support and mitigate resistance within law enforcement agencies.

 

Understanding the Root Causes of Pushback and Resistance

 

It is critical to examine the fundamental factors that drive pushback and dissent when dealing with opposition to decisions, actions, systems, or processes being proposed, planned, or implemented by police leaders. Resistance is often fueled by a lack of understanding or familiarity with an idea or concept. The more unclear an initiative, the more the audience will be concerned by its unintended consequences. Therefore, when seeking to sway others, it is best to first address their questions, apprehensions, and uneasiness. This can often be done by providing comprehensive and considered responses to their inquiries. People usually accept ideas or approaches that they have developed or helped to design themselves. This is why, wherever possible, engagement and discussion are so important. The more inclusive the initial development of a proposal, the better chance it has of being accepted.

​

Another common reason for pushback is thought to be inevitable. Individuals or groups may see themselves in opposition to or in competition with the new initiative being introduced, and this can lead to pushback as a means of protecting or promoting their position or interests. Turf wars and perceived encroachments on priority areas, funding, attention, or resources are all areas that police leaders should take into consideration. If there is or is perceived to be, competition over resources of any variety, some groups may push back to protect their interests.

​

Personal capacity to cope with additional workloads or new initiatives can prompt significant pushback. This is particularly true when dealing with the crisis of under-resourced, poorly supervised, overstressed staff being asked to adopt more processes, procedures, or tasks. Therefore, if a proposed initiative simply isn’t feasible given the current reality, it is highly unlikely to win support generally. This might mean recruiting and training additional staff to simply cope with the existing workload, before undertaking anything new.

 

Effective Communication Strategies to Build Buy-In

 

Policing is an inherently complicated and multifaceted prospect. There are endless opinions, facts, data, anecdotes, and hopes to consider. Simply making an idea go from thought process to action requires dozens of decisions. Moreover, getting that basic idea to a place where it is good policy requires further consideration, analysis, and vetting by internal committees, citizen groups, community advocates, and even stakeholders with competing interests. Afterward, training, resources, and attention still need to be allocated to its implementation, progress tracking, and ongoing evaluations. With the best intention, policing issues become dialogues rather than conversations and plans become proposals rather than ideas.

​

With even the simplest plans, add in the possibility of opposition and it becomes a political and tactical nightmare. How well leaders navigate the good intentions, differing perspectives, and genuine beliefs of others plays a significant role in the effectiveness of any policing strategy. When forming groups and traveling down the proverbial road, police leaders need to consider who their passengers will be, what method of travel should be taken, and how trips will differ depending on passengers, traveling method, and potential obstacles such as roadblocks and detours. Instead of suppressing pushback, police leaders should engage in a thoughtful process of navigating it.

​

Public information officers, social media managers, and community liaisons can be excellent allies, but police leaders still need to be mindful of the nuances that they inherently possess. Most police leaders are well acquainted with the uncomfortable feeling that many officers and staff experience when engaging in community events, frequent scrutiny, or branching out from traditional channels of communication. Many police leaders may not be root-minded people but rather, more thoughtful despite having been professionally socialized to think otherwise. However, any time police leaders are not entirely in control of the process, the message, or affecting outcomes, that is the case. What police leaders say and do is vitally important, but so is allowing the right people to be the messenger. It can be difficult – for years police leaders have advocated for transparency, accountability, and other forms of openness while, therefore, needing to relinquish some degree of safety and control.

 

Implementing Change Management Techniques to Overcome Resistance

​

In the context of law enforcement leadership, implementing change management techniques is crucial for overcoming resistance and generating buy-in for new initiatives. It is important to stress the importance of leadership strategy in influencing resistance to change, particularly during the implementation of lean manufacturing programs. Leaders need to understand the needs of their employees and create conducive conditions for the successful implementation of change initiatives. Developing a strategic plan for change and emphasizing using intuition, passion, and commitment of employees rather than force and control provide valuable insights into effective change management strategies.

​

It is also crucial to understand the challenges faced by police executives in implementing organizational changes within the closed police sub-culture and personnel system. It is important to understand the need for administrators to evaluate techniques to obtain support from personnel and to neutralize resistance to change. The suggested techniques include rationality and indoctrination, rewards and threats, cooptation and replacement, and camouflage and diversionary tactics, highlighting the diverse strategies available to overcome resistance within law enforcement agencies.

​

References:

​

M. Igleburger, R., E. Angell, J., & Pence, G. (1973). Changing Urban Police: Practitioners' View.

T. Hotchkiss, J. (2012). Leadership Traits: an Analysis of Perceived Leadership Qualities in Law Enforcement and Work Production.

​

Burmester, E. (2017). Qualitative Examination of Strategies to Overcome Resistance to Change in Lean Manufacturing.

​

R. Tyler, T. (2016). Police Discretion in the 21st Century Surveillance State.